SARS-CoV-2 transmission risk for common group activities and settings: a living scoping review

Author:

Vyas Niyati1,Bennett Alexandria1,Shaver Nicole1,Beck Andrew1,Zitiktye Gabriele1,Whelan Barbara2,O’Regan Rhea2,Conway Aileen2,Skidmore Becky3,Moher David14,Little Julian1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Knowledge Synthesis and Application Unit, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

2. Evidence Synthesis Ireland & Cochrane Ireland, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway , Galway, Ireland

3. Independent Information Specialist , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

4. Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Background While the modes of transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) are well studied, the risk of transmission in various group settings or activities is less clear. This living scoping review aims to summarize the risk factors of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread in common group activities (e.g. social gatherings) or settings (e.g. schools, hospitals, shared workplaces) to understand the drivers of transmission and to inform a risk assessment profile tool for use of rapid antigen detection tests. Methods We systematically searched electronic databases, MEDLINE and Embase, from January 2019 until February 2022. We included studies that evaluated the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in activities and settings, deemed strategically important to government departments in Ireland, provided by the Department of Health (Ireland) Expert Advisory Group on Rapid Testing. Results After screening 14 052 records, data from 139 studies were narratively synthesized. The risk was consistently reported as ‘high’ for large social events (e.g. weddings) and indoor sports, working in healthcare settings and shared workplaces, working/living in residential settings and travelling via public transportation. Most studies were from healthcare settings, with common risk factors including close contact with COVID-19 cases, working in high-risk departments and inappropriate use of personal protective equipment. For other settings and activities, lack of infection prevention and control practices reportedly contributed to infection transmission. Conclusion The heterogeneity across studies and lack of direct information on dominant variants, preventive measures, vaccination coverage necessitates further research on transmission risk within group activities to inform infection prevention and control measures.

Funder

Health Research Board through Evidence Synthesis Ireland

Department of Health (Ireland) Expert Advisory Group on Rapid Testing

The Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Evidence Alliance (SPOR EA) which is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) initiative

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3