Optimization of screening strategies for colorectal cancer based on fecal DNA and occult blood testing

Author:

Yao Tingting12,Sun Qin3,Xiong Kangwei12,Su Yuan12,Zhao Qian12,Zhang Chenhong12,Zhang Lijiu12,Li Xuejun3,Fang Haiming12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University , Hefei, Anhui Province, China

2. Center of Gut Microbiota, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University , Hefei, Anhui Province, China

3. Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine , Hefei, Anhui Province, China

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundFecal DNA and occult blood testing have been gradually developed for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Comparison of different testing strategies for these methods in CRC screening is in urgent need. This study aims to examine the efficacy of different testing strategies including multi-target fecal DNA testing, qualitative and quantitative fecal immunoassay tests (FITs).MethodsFecal samples were collected from patients diagnosed by colonoscopy. Tests using fecal DNA, quantitative FIT or qualitative FIT were performed on same fecal samples. Efficiency of different testing strategies within different populations was investigated.ResultsFor high-risk populations (CRC and advanced adenoma), the positive rate of the three methods alone was 74.3–80%; the positive predictive values (PPVs) ranged from 37.3% to 77.8%, and the negative predictive values (NPVs) ranged from 86.3% to 92.2%. For combined testing strategies, the positive rate was 71.4–88.6%, PPVs ranged from 38.3% to 86.2%, and NPVs ranged from 89.6% to 92.9%. Parallel fecal multi-target DNA test and quantitative FIT appears to be superior when using a combined testing strategy. For the normal population, no significant difference was identified in efficacy between these methods when used alone and in combination.ConclusionsSingle testing strategy among the three methods is more suitable for the general population screening, and the combined testing strategy is more suitable for high-risk populations screening. The use of different combination strategies may have superiority in CRC high-risk population screening, but cannot conclude significant differences which may be attributed to the small sample size, large samples controlled trials are needed.

Funder

Anhui Medical University Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference32 articles.

1. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012;Ferlay;Int J Cancer,2015

2. Colorectal cancer epidemiology: recent trends and impact on outcomes;Baidoun;Curr Drug Targets,2021

3. Cancer statistics in China, 2015;Chen;CA Cancer J Clin,2016

4. Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020;Cao;Chin Med J (Engl),2021

5. Association of colonoscopy adenoma findings with long-term colorectal cancer incidence;Click,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3