Comparison of provider satisfaction with specialty pharmacy services in integrated health-system and external practice models: A multisite survey

Author:

Anguiano Rebekah H1,Zuckerman Autumn D2,Hall Elizabeth3,Diamantides Erica4,Kumor Lisa1,Duckworth Deborah L5,Peter Megan2,Sorgen Patrick J6,Nathanson Amy7,Kandah Huda-Marie8,Dura Jillian9,Campbell Udobi10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL, and Specialty Pharmacy Services, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Science System, Chicago, IL, USA

2. Vanderbilt Specialty Pharmacy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

3. The Ohio State University Outpatient Pharmacy, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA

4. Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington (UW) Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA

5. Specialty Pharmacy and Infusion Services, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA

6. Advanced Therapies Pharmacy, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA

7. Pharmacy Services, Johns Hopkins Home Care Group, Baltimore, MD, USA

8. Specialty Pharmacy, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

9. Specialty Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

10. Department of Pharmacy Services, University of North Carolina Health Care System, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study is to obtain insight into providers’ satisfaction with services offered by health-system integrated specialty pharmacies and to determine whether providers’ perceptions of services offered under an integrated model differ from perceptions of external specialty pharmacy services. Methods A multi-site, cross-sectional, online survey of specialty clinic healthcare providers at 10 academic health systems with integrated specialty pharmacies was conducted. The questionnaire was developed by members of the Vizient Specialty Pharmacy Outcomes and Benchmarking Workgroup and was pretested at 3 pilot sites prior to dissemination. Prescribers of specialty medications within each institution were identified and sent an email invitation to participate in the study that included a link to the anonymous questionnaire. Respondents were asked to rate their agreement with 10 statements regarding quality of services of integrated and external specialty pharmacies on a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). An analysis to determine differences in providers’ overall satisfaction with the integrated and external specialty pharmacy practice models, as well as differences in satisfaction scores for each of the 10 statements, was performed using paired-samples t tests. Results The mean (SD) score for overall satisfaction with integrated specialty pharmacies was significantly higher than the score for satisfaction with external specialty pharmacies: 4.72 (0.58) vs 2.97 (1.20); 95% confidence interval, 1.64-1.87; P < 0.001. Provider ratings of the integrated specialty pharmacy model were also higher for all 10 items evaluating the quality of services (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Conclusion The study results confirm that the health-system integrated specialty pharmacy practice model promotes high rates of provider satisfaction with services and perceived benefits.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy,Pharmacology

Reference49 articles.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3