A cost avoidance study of critical care pharmacists’ interventions in a tertiary institution in Singapore

Author:

Chan Lin En Jeremy1,Soong Jie Lin12,Lie Sui An3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore , Singapore

2. Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital , Singapore

3. Department of Surgical Intensive Care, Division of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Singapore General Hospital , Singapore

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThe economic impact of critical care pharmacists in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting has not been evaluated in Singapore despite ICUs being high-cost areas. This study was conducted to determine the costs avoided as a result of pharmacists’ interventions within multidisciplinary ICU teams in a tertiary hospital in Singapore.MethodsA single-center, retrospective observational study of accepted pharmacists’ interventions was conducted over 6 months in 2020. We adopted a previously published systematic approach to estimate the costs avoided by the healthcare system through pharmacists’ interventions. Interventions were independently reviewed by a critical care pharmacist, an intensivist, and an investigator. Cost avoidance was calculated in terms of the additional ICU length of stay that would have resulted had a pharmacist not intervened as well as the direct cost savings achieved.ResultsThere were 632 medication-related problems (MRPs) associated with the 527 accepted interventions, as some interventions involved multiple MRPs. The most common interventions included correcting inappropriate drug regimens (n = 363; 57%), recommending drug monitoring (n = 65; 10%) and addressing omission of drugs (n = 50; 8%). Over 6 months, gross cost avoidance and net cost avoidance achieved were $186,852 and $140,004, respectively, resulting in a ratio of potential monetary cost avoidance to pharmacist salary of 3.99:1. The top 3 interventions that resulted in the greatest cost avoidance were those that corrected inappropriate drug regimens ($146,870; 79%), avoided adverse drug events (ADEs) ($10,048; 5%), and led to discontinuation of medications without any indication ($7,239; 4%).ConclusionPharmacists can reduce healthcare expenditure substantially through cost avoidance by performing various interventions in ICUs, particularly in the areas of correcting inappropriate drug regimens, avoiding ADEs, and discontinuing unnecessary medications.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy,Pharmacology

Reference107 articles.

1. Shift in emphasis from hospital to community care will help tame healthcare costs: Ong Ye Kung;Ng;Straits Times

2. Characteristics, outcomes, and cost patterns of high-cost patients in the intensive care unit;Reardon;Crit Care Res Pract,2018

3. Position paper on critical care pharmacy services: 2020 update;Lat;Crit Care Med,2020

4. Impact on patient outcomes of pharmacist participation in multidisciplinary critical care teams: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Lee;Crit Care Med,2019

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3