Implementation and results of a standardized process for identifying ambulatory pharmacy clinical outcome measures

Author:

McKay Connor1,Vest Mary-Haston2,Doligalski Christina3,Summerlin Charles M2,Alexander Maurice D3,Deyo Zachariah M3,Valgus John M3,Waldron Kayla M4

Affiliation:

1. MUSC University Medical Center , Charleston, SC , USA

2. UNC Health , Morrisville, NC , USA

3. University of North Carolina Hospitals , Chapel Hill, NC , USA

4. UNC Health, Morrisville , NC , USA

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Given the variation in clinical practice, a clinician-centric, standardized process to implement and validate clinical pharmacy outcome measures was developed. Summary Four specialty clinics with embedded clinic-based pharmacists underwent an iterative process to define, refine, and implement the build of electronic health record functionality for outcome measure data collection and reporting. Starting with a list of identified measures, clinic workgroups met to discuss each measure and identify gaps in measure implementation. Information technology experts created electronic documentation forms with discrete data and reports based on criteria specified by the clinic workgroups. Of 32 outcome measures identified as priorities for demonstrating pharmacists’ impact in previous research, 29 were implemented for routine monitoring through this project. Implementation strategies included identification through existing reporting, development of discrete documentation tools within the electronic health record, and development of new reporting tools from available discrete data fields. Time to implementation decreased from the first to the last pilot clinic implementation, as demonstrated through a 9-day reduction in electronic documentation form development and 31-day reduction in report development turnaround time. Conclusion A standardized and reproducible process was developed for the implementation of clinical pharmacy outcomes measures for 4 specialty clinics. The process was successfully utilized to develop measurable outputs for a variety of oncology and nononcology specialty disease states based upon multidisciplinary stakeholder input.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy,Pharmacology

Reference24 articles.

1. Medicare Program; Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) incentive under the physician fee schedule, and criteria for physician-focused payment models. Final rule with comment period;Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services;Fed Regist,2016

2. Systematic review of high-cost patients’ characteristics and healthcare utilisation;Wammes;BMJ Open,2018

3. The $2.6 billion pill — methodologic and policy considerations;Avorn;N Engl J Med,2015

4. An overview of immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation.;Enderby;Am J Manag Care.,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3