Usefulness of Serum Leucine-rich Alpha 2 Glycoprotein in Crohn’s Disease: Is There Any Difference between Small Intestine and Colonic Lesions?

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe usefulness of leucine-rich alpha 2 glycoprotein (LRG) to evaluate Crohn’s disease (CD) activity differs among various intestinal lesions. We aimed to evaluate the association between endoscopic disease activity based on the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s disease (SES-CD) and LRG level separately for small intestinal and colonic lesions.MethodsWe examined the correlation between LRG level and SES-CD and performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the LRG cutoff value in 141 patients who underwent endoscopy (total 235 measurements). Furthermore, the LRG cutoff value was analyzed by comparing small intestinal and colonic lesions.ResultsLRG levels were significantly higher in patients without mucosal healing than in those with mucosal healing (15.9 μg/mL vs 10.5 μg/mL, P < .0001). The LRG cutoff value for mucosal healing was 14.3 μg/mL (area under the ROC curve [AUC]: 0.80; sensitivity: 0.89; specificity: 0.63). The LRG cutoff value for patients with type L1 was 14.3 μg/mL (sensitivity: 0.91; specificity: 0.53), and that for patients with type L2 was 14.0 μg/mL (sensitivity: 0.95; specificity: 0.73). The diagnostic performance (AUC) of LRG and C-reactive protein (CRP) for mucosal healing was, respectively, 0.75 and 0.60 (P = 0.01) in patients with type L1 and 0.80 and 0.85 (P = 0.90) in patients with type L2.ConclusionsThe optimal LRG cutoff value for evaluating mucosal healing in CD is 14.3 μg/mL. LRG is more useful than CRP for predicting mucosal healing in patients with type L1. The superiority of LRG to CRP differs between small intestinal and colonic lesions.