Therapists’ experiences of remotely delivering cognitive-behavioural or graded-exercise interventions for fatigue: a qualitative evaluation

Author:

Bennett Sarah E1ORCID,Almeida Celia23,Bachmair Eva-Maria4,Gray Stuart R5ORCID,Lovell Karina6,Paul Lorna7,Wearden Alison8,Macfarlane Gary J4ORCID,Basu Neil9,Dures Emma23

Affiliation:

1. Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol , Bristol, UK

2. School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England , Bristol, UK

3. Academic Rheumatology, Bristol Royal Infirmary , Bristol, UK

4. Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health (Epidemiology Group), University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen, UK

5. Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow , Glasgow, UK

6. Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester , Manchester, UK

7. School of Health and Life Science, Glasgow Caledonian University , Glasgow, UK

8. Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester , Manchester, UK

9. Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow , Glasgow, UK

Abstract

Abstract Objective Fatigue is a challenging feature of all inflammatory rheumatic diseases. LIFT (Lessening the Impact of Fatigue in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a randomized Trial) included remotely delivered personalized exercise programme (PEP) or cognitive-behavioural approach (CBA) interventions. The aim of this nested qualitative evaluation was to understand rheumatology health professionals’ (therapists’) perspectives of delivering the interventions in the LIFT trial. Methods A subgroup of therapists who had delivered the personalized exercise programme (PEP) and cognitive-behavioural approach (CBA) interventions took part in semi-structured telephone interviews. Results Seventeen therapists (13 women and 4 men) who delivered PEP (n = 8) or CBA (n = 9) interventions participated. Five themes were identified. In ‘The benefits of informative, structured training’, therapists described how they were able to practice their skills, and the convenience of having the LIFT manual for reference. When ‘Getting into the swing of it’, supporting patients gave therapists the confidence to tailor the content of the manual to each patient. Clinical supervision supported therapists to gain feedback and request assistance when required. In ‘Delivering the intervention’, therapists reported that patients valued the opportunity to talk about their fatigue and challenge their beliefs. In ‘Challenges in delivering the LIFT intervention’, therapists struggled to work in partnership with patients who lacked motivation or stopped engaging. Finally, in ‘LIFT developing clinical skills’, therapists gained confidence and professional satisfaction, seeing patients’ fatigue improve over time. Conclusion The findings support the provision of training for rheumatology health professionals to remotely deliver fatigue-management interventions. Insights from these trials can be used to better improve clinical practice and service provision.

Funder

Versus Arthritis

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Rheumatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3