Anastomotic leak following oesophagectomy: research priorities from an international Delphi consensus study

Author:

,Kamarajah Sivesh K,Mohamed Imran,Nepogodiev Dmitri,Evans Richard P T,Hodson James,Griffiths Ewen A,Singh Pritam,Kamarajah Sivesh K,Griffiths Ewen A,Singh Pritam,Alderson Derek,Bundred James,Evans Richard,Gossage James,Griffiths Ewen A,Jefferies Benjamin,Kamarajah Sivesh K,McKay Siobhan,Mohamed Imran,Nepogodiev Dmitri,Siaw-Acheampong Kobby,Singh Pritam,van Hillegersberg Richard,Vohra Ravinder,Wanigsooriya Kasun,Whitehouse Tony,Bekele A,Achiam M P,Ahmed H,Ainsworth A,Akhtar K,Akkapulu N,Al-Khyatt W,Alasmar M,Alemu B N,Alfieri R,Alkhaffaf B,Alvarez L S,Amahu V,Andreollo N A,Arias F,Ariyarathenam A,Arndt A,Athanasiou A,Azagra J S,Baban C,Babor R,Baili E,Balla A,Beenen E,Bendixen M,Bennett J,Bergeat D,Bernardes A J,Bernardi D,Berrisford R,Bianchi A,Bjelovic M,Blencowe N,Boddy A,Bogdan S,Bolger J,Bonavina L,Bouras G,Bouwense S,Bowrey D,Bragg D,Bright T N,Broderick S,Buduhan G,Byrne B,Carey D,Carroll P,Carrott P,Casaca R,Castro R G,Catton J,Cerdeira M P,Chang A C,Charalabopoulos A,Chaudry A,Choh C,Ciprian B,Ciubotaru C,Coe P,Colak E,Colino R B,Colucci N,Costa P M,Daniela K,Das N,Davies A,Davies N,de Manzoni G,del Val I D,Dexter S,Dolan J,Donlon N,Donohoe C,Duffy J,Dwerryhouse S,Egberts J H,Ekwunife C,Elhadi A,Elhadi M,Elliott J A,Elnagar H,Elnagar F,Faraj H A,Farooq N,Fearon N,Fekaj E,Forshaw M,Freire J,Gačevski G,Gaedcke J,Giacopuzzi S,Gijón M M,Gisbertz S,Golcher H,Gordon A,Gossage J,Griffiths E,Grimminger P,Guner A,Gutknecht S,Harustiak T,Hedberg J,Heisterkamp J,Hii M,Hindmarsh A,Holm J,Hornby S,Isik A,Izbicki J,Jagadesham V,Jaunoo S,Johansson J,Johnson M A,Johnston B,Kapoulas S,Kauppi J,Kauppila J H,Kechagias A,Kelly M,Kelty C,Kennedy A,Khan M,Khattak S,Kidane B,Kjaer D W,Klarenbeek B,Korkolis D P,Koshy R M,Krantz S,Lagarde S,Larsen M H,Lau P C,Leeder P C,Leite J S,Liakakos T,Madhavan A,Mahdi S I,Mahendran H A,Mahmoodzadeh H,Majbar A,Manatakis D,Markar S,Martijnse I,Matei B,Matos da Costa P,McCormack K,McNally S,Meriläinen S,Merrett N,Migliore M,Mingol F,Khan M,Mitton D,Mogoanta S S,Mönig S P,Moorthy K,Muhinga M,Mwachiro M,Naeem A,Nasir I,Navidi M,Negoi I,Negoiță V,Niazi S K,Nilsson M,Pazdro A,Pera M,Perez C J,Perivoliotis K,Peters C,Phillips A W,Powell A,Prove L,Pucher P H,Rahman S,Räsänen J V,Read M,Reeh M,Reim D,Reynolds J,Robb W B,Robertson K,Rodica B,Rosero G,Rosman C,Saadeh L,Santos EG,Saunders J,Sayyed R,Schizas D,Scurtu R R,Sekhniaidze D,Serralheiro P A,Sevinç B,Sgromo B,Shakeel O,Siemsen M,Skipworth R,Smith B,Soares A,Spillane J,Steliga M A,Sundbom M,Sydiuk A,Takahashi A M L,Talbot M,Tan B,Tareen M A,Tewari N,Tez M,Theodorou D,Tita A,Toledo E,Townend P J,Triantafyllou T,Trugeda M,Tucker O,Turner P,Turrado V,Underwood T,Vaccari S,Valmasoni M,van Berge Henegouwen M,van Boxel G,van den Berg J W,van der Sluis P,van Hillegersberg R,van Lanschot J J B,van Workum F,Vickers J,Videira J,Viswanath Y,Vohra R,Voon K,Wadley M,Walker R,Wallner B,Walsh T N,Weindelmayer J,Welch N,Wheatley T,Wijnhoven B,Wong L F,Yanni F,Yeung J

Abstract

Abstract Background The Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) is an international collaborative group set up to study anastomotic leak outcomes after oesophagectomy for cancer. This Delphi study aimed to prioritize future research areas of unmet clinical need in RCTs to reduce anastomotic leaks. Methods A modified Delphi process was overseen by the OGAA committee, national leads, and engaged clinicians from high-income countries (HICs) and low/middle-income countries (LMICs). A three-stage iterative process was used to prioritize research topics, including a scoping systematic review (stage 1), and two rounds of anonymous electronic voting (stages 2 and 3) addressing research priority and ability to recruit. Stratified analyses were performed by country income. Results In stage 1, the steering committee proposed research topics across six domains: preoperative optimization, surgical oncology, technical approach, anastomotic technique, enhanced recovery and nutrition, and management of leaks. In stages 2 and stage 3, 192 and 171 respondents respectively participated in online voting. Prioritized research topics include prehabilitation, anastomotic technique, and timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy. Stratified analyses by country income demonstrated no significant differences in research priorities between HICs and LMICs. However, for ability to recruit, there were significant differences between LMICs and HICs for themes related to the technical approach (minimally invasive, width of gastric tube, ischaemic preconditioning) and location of the anastomosis. Conclusion Several areas of research priority are consistent across LMICs and HICs, but discrepancies in ability to recruit by country income will inform future study design.

Funder

Birmingham Surgical Trials Consortium

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3