Religion and Sanitation Practices

Author:

Adukia Anjali1,Alsan Marcella2,Babiarz Kim3,Goldhaber-Fiebert Jeremy D4,Prince Lea5

Affiliation:

1. University of Chicago

2. Harvard Kennedy School of Government and a faculty research fellow at NBER

3. Social science research scholar at Stanford University

4. Associate professor at Stanford University

5. Research analyst at Stanford University

Abstract

Abstract In India, infant mortality among Hindus is higher than among Muslims, and religious differences in sanitation practices have been cited as a contributing factor. To explore whether religion itself is associated with differences in sanitation practices, this study compares sanitation practices of Hindus and Muslims living in the same locations using three nationally representative data sets from India. Across all three data sets, the unconditional religion-specific gap in latrine ownership and latrine use declines by approximately two-thirds when conditioning on location characteristics or including location fixed effects. Further, the estimates do not show evidence of religion-specific differences in other sanitation practices, such as handwashing or observed fecal material near homes. Household sanitation practices vary substantially across areas of India, but religion itself has less direct influence when considering differences between Hindus and Muslims within the same location.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Development,Accounting

Reference41 articles.

1. Sanitation and Education;Adukia;American Economic Journal: Applied Economics,2017

2. Educational Investment Responses to Economic Opportunity: Evidence from Indian Road Construction;Adukia;American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.

3. Mid Term Evaluation of Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) Programme;AFC,2005

4. Watersheds in Child Mortality: The Role of Effective Water and Sewerage Infrastructure, 1880–1920;Alsan;Journal of Political Economy,2019

5. Intergenerational Mobility in India: Estimates from New Methods and Administrative Data;Asher,2018

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3