Understanding Pandemic Solidarity: Mutual Support During the First COVID-19 Lockdown in the United Kingdom

Author:

Johnson Stephanie1,Roberts Stephen23ORCID,Hayes Sarah4,Fiske Amelia5ORCID,Lucivero Federica1,McLennan Stuart5,Phillips Amicia6,Samuel Gabrielle7,Prainsack Barbara8

Affiliation:

1. Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford , Oxford , UK

2. Institute for Global Health, University College London (UCL) , London , UK

3. Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) , London , UK

4. Vienna School of International Studies, Diplomatic Academy Vienna , Vienna , Austria

5. Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Department of Clinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich , Munich , Germany

6. Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven , Leuven , Belgium

7. Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King’s College London, Bush House, The Strand , London , UK

8. Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Neues Institutsgebäude , Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Vienna , Austria

Abstract

Abstract Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the concept of solidarity has been invoked frequently. Much interest has centred around how citizens and communities support one another during times of uncertainty. Yet, empirical research which accounts and understands citizen’s views on pandemic solidarity, or their actual practices has remained limited. Drawing upon the analysis of data from 35 qualitative interviews, this article investigates how residents in England and Scotland enacted, understood, or criticised (the lack of) solidarity during the first national lockdown in the United Kingdom in April 2020—at a time when media celebrated solidarity as being at an all-time high. It finds that although solidarity was practiced by some people, the perceived lack of solidarity was just as pronounced. We conclude that despite frequent mobilisations of solidarity by policy makers and other public actors, actual practices of solidarity are poorly understood—despite the importance of solidarity for public health and policy.

Funder

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference53 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3