Temperature dependence of nitrate-reducing Fe(II) oxidation by Acidovorax strain BoFeN1 – evaluating the role of enzymatic vs. abiotic Fe(II) oxidation by nitrite

Author:

Dopffel Nicole12,Jamieson James34ORCID,Bryce Casey5,Joshi Prachi2,Mansor Muammar2,Siade Adam34,Prommer Henning34,Kappler Andreas26

Affiliation:

1. Norwegian Research Center – NORCE, 22 Nygårdstangen, 5838 Bergen, Norway

2. Geomicrobiology, Center for Applied Geosciences, University of Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany

3. School of Earth Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, 6009 Crawley, Australia

4. CSIRO Land and Water, 147 Underwood Avenue, 6014 Floreat, Australia

5. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, United Kingdom

6. Cluster of Excellence EXC 2124: Controlling Microbes to Fight Infection, University of Tubingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany

Abstract

ABSTRACT Fe(II) oxidation coupled to nitrate reduction is a widely observed metabolism. However, to what extent the observed Fe(II) oxidation is driven enzymatically or abiotically by metabolically produced nitrite remains puzzling. To distinguish between biotic and abiotic reactions, we cultivated the mixotrophic nitrate-reducing Fe(II)-oxidizing Acidovorax strain BoFeN1 over a wide range of temperatures and compared it to abiotic Fe(II) oxidation by nitrite at temperatures up to 60°C. The collected experimental data were subsequently analyzed through biogeochemical modeling. At 5°C, BoFeN1 cultures consumed acetate and reduced nitrate but did not significantly oxidize Fe(II). Abiotic Fe(II) oxidation by nitrite at different temperatures showed an Arrhenius-type behavior with an activation energy of 80±7 kJ/mol. Above 40°C, the kinetics of Fe(II) oxidation were abiotically driven, whereas at 30°C, where BoFeN1 can actively metabolize, the model-based interpretation strongly suggested that an enzymatic pathway was responsible for a large fraction (ca. 62%) of the oxidation. This result was reproduced even when no additional carbon source was present. Our results show that at below 30°C, i.e. at temperatures representing most natural environments, biological Fe(II) oxidation was largely responsible for overall Fe(II) oxidation, while abiotic Fe(II) oxidation by nitrite played a less important role.

Funder

DFG

U.S. Department of Energy

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Ecology,Microbiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3