Research, innovation, and bankruptcy: evidence from European manufacturing firms

Author:

Agostino Mariarosaria1,Scalera Domenico2,Succurro Marianna1,Trivieri Francesco1

Affiliation:

1. Dipartimento di Economia Statistica e Finanza, Universita della Calabria, Ponte Pietro Bucci, Arcavacata di Rende 87036, Italy

2. Dipartimento di Diritto, Economia, Management e Metodi Quantitativi, Universita degli Studi del Sannio, Palazzo De Simone, Benevento 82100, Italy

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the effects of R&D and innovation activities of firms on the risk of bankruptcy. The analysis is carried out on data drawn from the EU-EFIGE Survey and Amadeus Database (Bureau Van Dijk) on European manufacturing firms over the years 2009–2014. The empirical evidence shows that default probability is increasing in R&D investments and decreasing in innovation and productivity of research, measured by the ratio of innovation revenues to R&D outlays. In addition, to disentangle the influence of different innovation strategies (product, process, and patenting), 16 different firm profiles are compared. Firms carrying out R&D, adopting process innovation, and filing for patents are found to show the lowest probability of default. Sensitivity checks indicate that research and innovation do not affect the risk of financial distress events short of default (such as reorganization or application for insolvency procedure). Our findings are robust to potential endogeneity and hence allow for causal inference about the relationship between research and innovation and corporate bankruptcy.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Economics and Econometrics

Reference58 articles.

1. Who benefits from longer lending relationships? An analysis on European SMEs’ riskiness;Agostino;Journal of Small Business Management,2018

2. Does trade credit affect technical efficiency? Empirical evidence from Italian manufacturing SMEs;Agostino;Journal of Small Business Management,2019

3. The EU-EFIGE/Bruegel-Unicredit dataset;Altomonte,2012

4. New-firm survival and the technological regime;Audretsch;Review of Economics and Statistics,1991

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3