Treatment Patterns and Population Characteristics of Nonpharmacological Management of Chronic Pain in the United States’ Medicare Population: A Scoping Review

Author:

Choudry Erum1,Rofé Kara L1,Konnyu Kristin2,Marshall Brandon D L3ORCID,Shireman Theresa I4,Merlin Jessica S56,Trivedi Amal N47,Schmidt Catherine8,Bhondoekhan Fiona3,Moyo Patience4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Health, Brown University , Providence, Rhode Island , USA

2. Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University , Providence, Rhode Island , USA

3. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University , Providence, Rhode Island , USA

4. Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University , Providence, Rhode Island , USA

5. Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania , USA

6. Division of Infectious Disease, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania , USA

7. Department of Medicine, Brown University , Providence, Rhode Island , USA

8. Department of Physical Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital Institute of Health Professions, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences , Boston, Massachusetts , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives Clinical practice guidelines recommend noninvasive nonpharmacological pain therapies; however, reviews that assess the literature pertaining to nonpharmacological pain management among older adults and people with long-term disabilities who are disproportionately affected by pain are lacking. This scoping review aimed to systematically map and characterize the existing studies about the receipt of noninvasive, nonpharmacological pain therapies by Medicare beneficiaries. Research Design and Methods We conducted a literature search in MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCO), SocINDEX (EBSCO), Cochrane Library, Web of Science citation indices, and various sources of gray literature. The initial search was conducted on November 2, 2021, and updated on March 9, 2022. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for inclusion and extracted the characteristics of the studies, studied populations, and nonpharmacological pain therapies. Data were summarized using tabular and narrative formats. Results The final review included 33 studies. Of these, 24 were quantitative, 7 were qualitative, and 2 were mixed-methods studies. Of 32 studies that focused on Medicare beneficiaries, 10 did not specify the Medicare type, and all but one of the remaining studies were restricted to fee-for-service enrollees. Back and neck pain and arthritis were the most commonly studied pain types. Chiropractic care (n = 19) and physical therapy (n = 17) appeared frequently among included studies. The frequency and/or duration of nonpharmacological treatment were mentioned in 13 studies. Trends in the utilization of nonpharmacological pain therapies were assessed in 6 studies but none of these studies went beyond 2008. Discussion and Implications This scoping review found that manipulative therapies, mainly chiropractic, have been the most widely studied approaches for nonpharmacological pain management in the Medicare population. The review also identified the need for future research that updates trend data and addresses contemporary issues such as rising Medicare Advantage enrollment and promulgation of practice guidelines for pain management.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Life-span and Life-course Studies,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Health (social science)

Reference75 articles.

1. Chronic pain among adults—United States, 2019–2021;Rikard,2023

2. Prevalence of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain among adults—United States, 2016;Dahlhamer,2018

3. Prevalence and impact of pain among older adults in the United States: Findings from the 2011 National Health and Aging Trends Study;Patel,2013

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3