Feasibility and Acceptability of the Technology-Based Fall Risk Assessments for Older Adults

Author:

Thiamwong Ladda1,Garcia Oscar2,Choudhury Renoa2,Park Joon-Hyuk2,Stout Jeffrey2,Xie Rui2

Affiliation:

1. College of Nursing, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, United States

2. University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, United States

Abstract

Abstract Promising technologies, which are simple, portable, quick, non-invasive, and inexpensive, may open new horizons on fall risk assessments and provide important information for older adults. We used a mixed-methods approach to examine the feasibility and acceptability of technology-based fall risk assessments, including the BTrackS Balance System, Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis, and activity monitoring devices among older adults. Data were collected via a Qualtrics survey and interviews. The acceptability was measured by the Senior Technology Acceptance (STA) and semi-structured interviews with 15 participants. The STA consists of four domains with 14 items, and the semi-structured interview includes three main questions related to experiences about balance performance tests, body composition, and activity monitoring. One hundred twenty-four community-dwelling older adults completed the online survey, and 15 older adults participated in the interviews. The majority of participants were female, and 72% had no history of falls. Race and ethnicity were 17% Hispanic, 7% African Americans, and 3% Asian Americans. About 7% had COVID-19 positive, 31% reported fear of COVID, and 14.5% were afraid of losing their life to COVID. The word-of-mouth strategy and key person approach were used and had an incredible impact on the recruitment process. None of the participants had ever had their fall risk and fear of falling assessed before agreeing to participate in this study. The technology-based fall risk assessments were feasible and acceptable. About 78% of participants liked the idea of using technology to assess falls risk, and 79% agreed that using technology would enhance their effectiveness in daily activities.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Life-span and Life-course Studies,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Health (social science)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3