Decision Making for Patients With Severe Dementia Versus Normal Cognition Near the End of Life

Author:

Nicholas Lauren Hersch12ORCID,Halpern Scott D3,Weir David R4,Baum Micah Y4,Nolan Marie5,Gallo Joseph6,Langa Kenneth M47

Affiliation:

1. Division of Geriatrics & Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, Colorado , USA

2. Department of Economics, University of Colorado Denver , Denver, Colorado , USA

3. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , USA

4. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan , USA

5. School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, Maryland , USA

6. Department of Mental Health, School of Public Health , Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland , USA

7. University of Michigan Medical School, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives The clinical progression of severe dementia frequently leads to situations where surrogate decision makers must quickly make choices about potentially burdensome treatments that offer limited clinical benefit. We examined whether the number of decision makers and their access to advance directives were related to treatment choice for patients with severe dementia in comparison to those with normal cognition. Research Design and Methods We retrospectively linked survey responses about end-of-life treatment decisions to Medicare claims for Health and Retirement Study respondents dying between 2002 and 2015 whose next-of-kin reported a need for surrogate decision making. We estimated multivariable logistic regression models to study measures of aggressive care in the last 6 months of life; in-hospital death, burdensome transfers, and burdensome treatments. Results Compared to patients who were cognitively normal near the end of life (n = 1 198), patients with severe dementia (n = 722) were less likely to experience burdensome treatments (18% [95% confidence interval {CI} 14–21] vs 32% [95% CI 29–35]), burdensome transfers (20% [95% CI 17–24] vs 30% [95% CI 27–33]), and in-hospital death (24% [95% CI 20–28] vs 30% [95% CI 26–33]) when surrogates were involved. Rates of burdensome treatments, transfers, or in-hospital death for decedents with severe dementia did not vary with single versus multiple decision makers or when decision makers were informed by advance directives. However, among decedents with normal cognition, a single decision maker informed by an advance directive was associated with the lowest rates of burdensome treatments and in-hospital death. Discussion and Implications Surrogate decision makers made similar choices around end-of-life care for patients with severe dementia regardless of the number of decision makers and availability of advance directives. However, both advance directives and single decision makers were associated with less aggressive care for cognitively normal decedents.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Life-span and Life-course Studies,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Health (social science)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3