Evidence for a large strike-slip component during the 1960 Chilean earthquake

Abstract

SUMMARY The strainmeter record observed at Isabella (ISA), California, for the 1960 Chilean earthquake (Mw = 9.5) is one of the most important historical records in seismology because it was one of the three records that provided the opportunity for the first definitive observations of free oscillations of the Earth. Because of the orientation of the strainmeter rod with respect to the back azimuth to Chile, the ISA strainmeter is relatively insensitive to G (Love) waves and higher order (order ≥ 6) toroidal modes, yet long-period G waves and toroidal modes were recorded with large amplitude on this record. This observation cannot be explained with the conventional low-angle thrust mechanism typical of great subduction-zone earthquakes and requires an oblique mechanism with half strike-slip and half thrust. The strain record at Ogdenburg, New Jersey, the Press–Ewing seismograms at Berkeley, California, and the ultra-long period displacement record at Pasadena, California, also support the oblique mechanism. We tested the performance of the ISA strainmeter using other events including the 1964 Alaskan earthquake and found no instrumental problems. Thus, the ISA observation of large G/R and toroidal/spheroidal ratios most likely reflects the real characteristics of the 1960 Chilean earthquake, rather than an observational artefact. The interpretation of the large strike-slip component is not unique, but it may represent release of the strike-slip strain that has accumulated along the plate boundary as a result of oblique convergence at the Nazca–South American plate boundary. The slip direction of the 2010 Chilean (Maule) earthquake ( Mw = 8.8) is rotated by about 10° clockwise from the plate convergence direction suggesting that right-lateral strain comparable to that of an Mw = 8.3 earthquake remained unreleased and accumulates near the plate boundary. One possible scenario is that the strike-slip strain accumulated over several great earthquakes like the 2010 Maule earthquake was released during the 1960 Chilean earthquake. If this is the case, we cannot always expect a similar behaviour for all the great earthquakes occurring in the same subduction zone and such variability needs to be considered in long-term hazard assessment of subduction-zone earthquakes.