Prognosis of poorly cohesive gastric cancer after complete cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CYTO-CHIP study)

Author:

Bonnot P E12,Lintis A23,Mercier F24ORCID,Benzerdjeb N5,Passot G2ORCID,Pocard M6,Meunier B7,Bereder J M8,Abboud K9,Marchal F10,Quenet F11,Goere D12,Msika S13,Arvieux C14ORCID,Pirro N15,Wernert R16,Rat P17,Gagnière J18,Lefevre J H19ORCID,Courvoisier T20,Kianmanesh R21,Vaudoyer D2,Rivoire M22,Meeus P22,Villeneuve L223,Piessen G3,Glehen O2,Abba Julio,Alyami Mohammad,Bakrin Naoual,Bernard Jean-Louis,Bibeau F,Bouzard Dominique,Brigand C,Carrère Sébastien,Carretier Michel,Castel Benjamin,Cotte Eddy,Celerier Bertrand,Ceribelli Cécilia,De Chaisemartin Cécile,De Franco Valeria,Deguelte-Lardiere Sophie,Delpero Jean-Robert,Desolneux Grégoire,Dumont Frédéric,Eveno Clarisse,Durand-Fontanier Sylvaine,Evrard Serge,Facy Olivier,Gelli Maximiliano,Gilly François-Noël,Guilloit Jean-Marc,Heyd, Bruno,Lelong Bernard,Lo Dico Réa,Loi Valeria,Mariani Pascale,Meffert Jean-Luc,Ortega-Deballon Pablo,Paquette Brice,Petorin Caroline,Passot Guillaume,Peyrat Patrice,Pezet Denis,Regimbeau Jean-Marc,Rohr Serge,Sabbagh Charles,Seitz Jean-François,Sgarbura Olivia,Sielezneff Igor,Sourrouille Isabelle,Taibi Abdelkader,Thibaudeau Emilie,Tuech Jean-Jacques,Vanbockstael Julie,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France

2. Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France

3. Department of General Surgery, CHU Lille, Lille, France

4. Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

5. Pathology Department, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon, Lyon, France

6. Department of Surgical Oncology, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France

7. Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Pontchaillou, Rennes, France

8. Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU L’Archet, Nice, France

9. Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU St Etienne, St Etienne, France

10. Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France

11. Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Val D’Aurelle, Montpellier, France

12. Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

13. Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Louis Mourier, Paris, France

14. Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU La Tronche, Grenoble, France

15. Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU La Timone, Marseille, France

16. Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paul Papin, Angers, France

17. Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Le Bocage, Dijon, France

18. Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont Ferrand, France

19. Department of Surgical Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France

20. Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France

21. Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Reims, Reims, France

22. Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France

23. Unité de Recherche Clinique, Pôle Information Médicale Evaluation Recherche, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France

Abstract

Abstract Background The incidence of gastric poorly cohesive carcinoma (PCC) is increasing. The prognosis for patients with peritoneal metastases remains poor and the role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is controversial. The aim was to clarify the impact of gastric PCC with peritoneal metastases treated by CRS with or without HIPEC. Methods All patients with peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer treated with CRS with or without HIPEC, in 19 French centres, between 1989 and 2014, were identified from institutional databases. Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes were compared between PCC and non-PCC subtypes, and the possible benefit of HIPEC was assessed. Results In total, 277 patients were included (188 PCC, 89 non-PCC). HIPEC was performed in 180 of 277 patients (65 per cent), including 124 of 188 with PCC (66 per cent). Median overall survival (OS) was 14.7 (95 per cent c.i. 12.7 to 17.3) months in the PCC group versus 21.2 (14.7 to 36.4) months in the non-PCC group (P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, PCC (hazard ratio (HR) 1.51, 95 per cent c.i. 1.01 to 2.25; P = 0.044) was associated with poorer OS, as were pN3, Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), and resection with a completeness of cytoreduction score of 1, whereas HIPEC was associated with improved OS (HR 0.52; P < 0.001). The benefit of CRS-HIPEC over CRS alone was consistent, irrespective of histology, with a median OS of 16.7 versus 11.3 months (HR 0.60, 0.39 to 0.92; P = 0.018) in the PCC group, and 34.5 versus 14.3 months (HR 0.43, 0.25 to 0.75; P = 0.003) in the non-PCC group. Non-PCC and HIPEC were independently associated with improved recurrence-free survival and fewer peritoneal recurrences. In patients who underwent HIPEC, PCI values of below 7 and less than 13 were predictive of OS in PCC and non-PCC populations respectively. Conclusion In selected patients, CRS-HIPEC offers acceptable outcomes among those with gastric PCC and long survival for patients without PCC.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3