Efficacy comparison of 3CL protease inhibitors ensitrelvir and nirmatrelvir against SARS-CoV-2in vitroandin vivo

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become established in the human population, making the need to develop safe and effective treatments critical. We have developed the small-molecule antiviral ensitrelvir, which targets the 3C-like (3CL) protease of SARS-CoV-2. This study evaluated the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of ensitrelvir compared with that of another SARS-CoV-2 3CL PI, nirmatrelvir.MethodsCultured cells, BALB/cAJcl mice and Syrian hamsters were infected with various SARS-CoV-2 strains, including the ancestral strain WK-521, mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 (MA-P10) strain, Delta strain and Omicron strain. Ensitrelvir efficacy was compared with that of nirmatrelvir. Effective concentrations were determined in vitro based on virus-induced cytopathic effects, viral titres and RNA levels. Lung viral titres, nasal turbinate titres, body-weight changes, and animal survival were also monitored.ResultsEnsitrelvir and nirmatrelvir showed comparable antiviral activity in multiple cell lines. Both ensitrelvir and nirmatrelvir reduced virus levels in the lungs of mice and the nasal turbinates and lungs of hamsters. However, ensitrelvir demonstrated comparable or better in vivo efficacy than that of nirmatrelvir when present at similar or slightly lower unbound-drug plasma concentrations.ConclusionsDirect in vitro and in vivo efficacy comparisons of 3CL PIs revealed that ensitrelvir demonstrated comparable in vitro efficacy to that of nirmatrelvir in cell culture and exhibited equal to or greater in vivo efficacy in terms of unbound-drug plasma concentration in both animal models evaluated. The results suggest that ensitrelvir may become an important resource for treating individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2.