Hollow-fibre system model of tuberculosis reproducibility and performance specifications for best practice in drug and combination therapy development

Author:

Gumbo Tawanda123ORCID,Srivastava Shashikant14,Deshpande Devyani3,Pasipanodya Jotam G23,Berg Alexander5,Romero Klaus6,Hermann David7,Hanna Debra7

Affiliation:

1. Hollow Fiber System & Experimental Therapeutics Laboratories, Praedicare Inc , Dallas, TX , USA

2. Quantitative Preclinical and Clinical Sciences Department, Praedicare Inc , Dallas, TX , USA

3. Center for Infectious Diseases Research and Experimental Therapeutics, Baylor Research Institute, Baylor University Medical Center , Dallas, TX , USA

4. Department of Pulmonary Immunology, University of Texas Health Centre, Tyler, TX , USA

5. Cognigen Division, Simulations Plus, Inc. , Buffalo, NY , USA

6. Critical Path Institute , Tucson, AZ , USA

7. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation , Seattle, WA , USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe hollow-fibre system model of tuberculosis (HFS-TB) has been endorsed by regulators; however, application of HFS-TB requires a thorough understanding of intra- and inter-team variability, statistical power and quality controls.MethodsThree teams evaluated regimens matching those in the Rapid Evaluation of Moxifloxacin in Tuberculosis (REMoxTB) study, plus two high-dose rifampicin/pyrazinamide/moxifloxacin regimens, administered daily for up to 28 or 56 days against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) under log-phase growth, intracellular growth or semidormant growth under acidic conditions. Target inoculum and pharmacokinetic parameters were pre-specified, and the accuracy and bias at achieving these calculated using percent coefficient of variation (%CV) at each sampling point and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).ResultsA total of 10 530 individual drug concentrations, and 1026 individual cfu counts were measured. The accuracy in achieving intended inoculum was >98%, and >88% for pharmacokinetic exposures. The 95% CI for the bias crossed zero in all cases. ANOVA revealed that the team effect accounted for <1% of variation in log10 cfu/mL at each timepoint. The %CV in kill slopes for each regimen and different Mtb metabolic populations was 5.10% (95% CI: 3.36%–6.85%). All REMoxTB arms exhibited nearly identical kill slopes whereas high dose regimens were 33% faster. Sample size analysis revealed that at least three replicate HFS-TB units are needed to identify >20% difference in slope, with a power of >99%.ConclusionsHFS-TB is a highly tractable tool for choosing combination regimens with little variability between teams, and between replicates.

Funder

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to Critical Path for TB Drug Regimens

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology,Microbiology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3