In vitro activity of cefiderocol against a global collection of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa with a high level of carbapenemase diversity
Author:
Gill Christian M1ORCID, Santini Debora1, Nicolau David P12, Aktas Elif, Alfouzan Wadha, Bourassa Lori, Brink Adrian, Burnham Carey-Ann D, Canton Rafael, Carmeli Yehuda, Falcone Marco, Kiffer Carlos, Marchese Anna, Martinez Octavio, Pournaras Spyros, Satlin Michael, Seifert Harald, Thabit Abrar K, Thomson Kenneth S, Villegas Maria Virginia, Wille Julia, Rezende Thais Teles Freitas, Cekin Zuhal, Malkocoglu Gulsah, Gijón Desirèe, Tarakmeh Layla Abdullah, Chu Chun Yat, Opperman Christoffel Johannes, Tootla Hafsah Deepa, Moodley Clinton, Coetzee Jennifer, Vourli Sophia, Dimopoulos George, Attallah Dalya M, Tiseo Giusy, Leonildi Alessandro, Giordano Cesira, Barnini Simona, Menichetti Francesco, Di Pilato Vincenzo, Codda Giulia, Vena Antonio, Giacobbe Daniele Roberto, Westblade Lars, Cardona Armando, Curtis Lauren, Fang Ferric, Thomson Gina,
Affiliation:
1. Center for Anti-Infective Research & Development, Hartford Hospital , 80 Seymour Street, Hartford 06102, CT , USA 2. Division of Infectious Diseases, Hartford Hospital , Hartford, CT , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To determine the in vitro activity of cefiderocol in a global collection of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa including >200 carbapenemase-producing isolates.
Methods
Isolates (n = 806) from the ERACE-PA Surveillance Program were assessed. Broth microdilution MICs were determined for cefiderocol (iron-depleted CAMHB) and comparators (CAMHB). Susceptibility was interpreted by CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints and reported as percent of isolates. The MIC distribution of cefiderocol in the entire cohort and by carbapenemase status was assessed.
Results
In the entire cohort, cefiderocol was the most active agent (CLSI 98% susceptible; EUCAST 95% susceptible; MIC50/90, 0.25/2 mg/L). Amikacin (urinary only breakpoint) was the second most active, with 70% of isolates testing as susceptible. The percentage of isolates susceptible to all other agents was low (<50%) including meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam, piperacillin/tazobactam and levofloxacin. Cefiderocol maintained significant activity against the most commonly encountered carbapenemases including VIM- (CLSI 97% susceptible; EUCAST 92% susceptible) and GES (CLSI 100% susceptible; EUCAST 97% susceptible)-harbouring isolates. The cefiderocol MIC distribution was similar regardless of carbapenemase status, with MIC50/90 values of 0.5/4 mg/L, 0.5/2 mg/L and 0.25/1 mg/L for MBL, serine carbapenemase and molecular carbapenemase-negative isolates, respectively.
Conclusions
Cefiderocol displayed potent in vitro activity in this global cohort of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa including >200 carbapenemase-harbouring isolates. Cefiderocol was highly active against MBL-producing isolates, where treatment options are limited. These data can help guide empirical therapy guidelines based on local prevalence of carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa or in response to rapid molecular diagnostics.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology,Microbiology (medical)
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|