The Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia Is Reliable and Valid in the Telehealth Setting for Patients with Cerebellar Ataxia

Author:

Reoli Rachel12ORCID,Therrien Amanda34,Millar Jennifer1,Hill Nayo56ORCID,Varghese Rini56,Roemmich Ryan15ORCID,Whitall Jill2,Bastian Amy1567,Keller Jennifer58

Affiliation:

1. Johns Hopkins Hospital Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, , Baltimore, MD, USA

2. University of Maryland Baltimore Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, , Baltimore, MD, USA

3. Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute , Elkins Park, PA, USA

4. Thomas Jefferson University Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, , Philadelphia, PA, USA

5. Kennedy Krieger Institute Department of Movement Studies, , Baltimore, MD, USA

6. Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Department of Neuroscience, , Baltimore, MD, USA

7. Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Department of Neurology, , Baltimore, MD, USA

8. Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, , Baltimore, MD, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective Health care has increasingly expanded into a hybrid in-person/telehealth model. Patients with a variety of health conditions, including cerebellar ataxia, have received virtual health evaluations; however, it remains unknown whether some outcome measures clinicians utilize in the telehealth setting are reliable and valid. The goal of this project is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) for patients with cerebellar ataxia in the telehealth setting. Methods Nineteen individuals with cerebellar impairments were recruited on a voluntary basis. Participants completed two 30-minute testing sessions during which a clinical examination and the SARA were performed. One session was performed in person and the other session was assessed remotely. Outcome measure performance was video recorded in both environments and independently scored by 4 additional raters with varying levels of clinical experience (ranging from 6 months to 29 years). Concurrent validity was assessed with the Spearman rank order correlation coefficient (α < .05), comparing the virtual SARA scores to their gold standard in-person scores. Interrater reliability was evaluated with the ICC(2,4) (α < .05). Results Fourteen of the 19 participants completed both in-person and telehealth SARA evaluations. We found that the in-person SARA and the telehealth SARA have large concurrent validity (Spearman rho significant at the 2-tailed α of .01 = 0.90; n = 14). Additionally, raters of varying years of experience had excellent interrater reliability for both the in-person SARA [ICC(2,4) = 0.97; n = 19] and the telehealth SARA [ICC(2,4) = 0.98; n = 14]. Conclusion Our results show that the telehealth SARA is comparable to the in-person SARA. Additionally, raters of varying years of clinical experience were found to have excellent interrater reliability scores for both remote and in-person SARA evaluations. Impact Our study shows that the SARA can be used in the telehealth setting for patients with ataxia.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3