Evaluating and Characterizing the Scope of Care for Interventions Labeled as Manual Therapy in Low back Pain Trials: A Scoping Review

Author:

Wenger Laura E12ORCID,Barrett Dustin R34,Rhon Daniel I56,Young Jodi L7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. DSc in Physical Therapy , Bellin College, Green Bay, WI and Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, , Salt Lake City, UT

2. University of Utah , Bellin College, Green Bay, WI and Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, , Salt Lake City, UT

3. DSc in Physical Therapy , Bellin College, Green Bay, Wisconsin and Department of Physical Therapy, , Marion, VA

4. Emory and Henry College , Bellin College, Green Bay, Wisconsin and Department of Physical Therapy, , Marion, VA

5. DSc in Physical Therapy , Bellin College, Green Bay, Wisconsin and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, , Bethesda, MD

6. Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences , Bellin College, Green Bay, Wisconsin and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, , Bethesda, MD

7. DSc in Physical Therapy, Bellin College , Green Bay, WI

Abstract

Abstract Objective The purpose of this scoping review was to evaluate and characterize the scope of care for low back pain that falls under the specific label of manual therapy. Methods PubMed database, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and SPORTDiscus were searched from journal inception through May 2022 for randomized controlled trials that investigated the treatment of low back pain using manual therapy. Terminology used to define manual therapy was extracted and categorized by using only the words included in the description of the intervention. An expert consultation phase was undertaken to gather feedback. Results One hundred seventy-six trials met final inclusion criteria, and 169 unique terms labeled as manual therapy for the treatment of low back pain were found. The most frequent terms were mobilization (29.0%), manipulation (16.0%), and thrust (6.4%). Eight percent of trials did not define or specify what type of manual therapy was used in the study. After removing duplicates, 169 unique terms emerged within 18 categories. Conclusions Manual therapy intervention labels used in low back pain trials are highly variable. With such variation, the heterogeneity of the intervention in trials is likely large, and the likelihood that different trials are comparing the same interventions is low. Researchers should consider being more judicious with the use of the term manual therapy and provide greater detail in titles, methods, and supplementary appendices in order to improve clarity, clinical applicability, and usefulness of future research. Impact The ability to interpret and apply findings from manual therapy related research for low back pain is challenging due to the heterogeneity of interventions under this umbrella term. A clear use of terminology and description of interventions by researchers will allow for improved understanding for the role of manual therapy in managing back pain.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3