Trajectories of Adherence to Home-Based Exercise Recommendations Among People With Low Back Pain: A Longitudinal Analysis

Author:

Arensman Remco M123ORCID,Heymans Martijn W4,Kloek Corelien J J156,Ostelo Raymond J W G789,Veenhof Cindy12356,Koppenaal Tjarco1231011,Pisters Martijn F1231011

Affiliation:

1. Center for Physical Therapy Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Julius Health Care Centers , Utrecht , The Netherlands

2. Physical Therapy Research , Department of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science and Sport, , Utrecht , The Netherlands

3. Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University , Department of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science and Sport, , Utrecht , The Netherlands

4. Department of Data Science and Bio-Statistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location VUmc , North-Holland, Amsterdam , The Netherlands

5. Expertise Center Healthy Urban Living , Research Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, , Utrecht , The Netherlands

6. HU University of Applied Sciences , Research Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, , Utrecht , The Netherlands

7. Department of Health Sciences , Faculty of Science, , North-Holland, Amsterdam , The Netherlands

8. VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute Amsterdam , Faculty of Science, , North-Holland, Amsterdam , The Netherlands

9. Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centre , Location VUmc, North-Holland, Amsterdam , The Netherlands

10. Research Group Empowering Healthy Behaviour , Department of Health Innovations and Technology, , North-Brabant, Eindhoven , The Netherlands

11. Fontys University of Applied Sciences , Department of Health Innovations and Technology, , North-Brabant, Eindhoven , The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study aimed to examine the presence of distinct trajectories of adherence to home-based exercise recommendations among people with low back pain (LBP). This study also aimed to identify differences in baseline characteristics among groups. Methods This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial investigating the cost-effectiveness of a stratified blended physical therapist intervention compared to usual care physical therapy in patients with LBP. The intervention group received usual care with integrated support via a smartphone app. A total of 208 patients were recruited from 58 primary care physical therapist practices. Baseline data included patient characteristics, physical functioning, pain intensity, physical activity, fear avoidance, pain catastrophizing, self-efficacy, self-management ability, and health-related quality of life. The Exercise Adherence Scale (score range = 0–100) was used to measure adherence during each treatment session. Latent class growth analysis was used to estimate trajectories of adherence. Results Adherence data were available from 173 out of 208 patients (83%). Data were collected during an average of 5.1 (standard deviation [SD] = 2.5) treatment sessions, with total treatment duration of 51 (SD = 41.7) days. Three trajectory classes were identified: “declining adherence” (12%), “stable adherence” (45%), and “increasing adherence” (43%). No differences in baseline characteristic were found between groups. Conclusion Three adherence trajectories to exercise recommendations were identified in patients with LBP. However, baseline characteristics cannot identify a patient’s trajectory group. Impact Despite the presence of distinct trajectories of adherence in patients with LBP, physical therapists should not attempt to place a patient in a trajectory group at the start of treatment. Instead, adherence should be closely monitored as treatment progresses and supported when required as part of an ongoing process.

Funder

Taskforce for Applied Research SIA

Dutch Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3