Authority and Communication

Author:

Cheong Pauline Hope1

Affiliation:

1. Human Communication, Arizona State University

Abstract

Abstract Contentions involving the survivability of religious authority and the uprising of new technologies are historical and recurrent. This chapter discusses the scholarship strand on paradoxes and dialectics, evinced by the dual dynamics of weakening and strengthening of religious authority amid possibilities for conflict and accommodation in our present and digital futures. In doing so, the chapter explicates key communication practices that underpin the constitution of religious authority, summarily described as strategic arbitration, invocation, and branding. Next, in light of intensified challenges in leadership performances, this chapter discusses the dialectical tensions navigated in various contexts—including autonomy-connection, display-concealment, and privilege-disadvantage—to illustrate the precarious durability of religious authority. Finally, this chapter concludes with recommendations for future research in religious authority regarding global and comparative research, intersectional analyses, mixed methods and longitudinal design, and attention to the rise of the internet of things and artificial intelligence to increase ecology validity in fieldwork.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference61 articles.

1. When Facebook Becomes Faithbook: Exploring Religious Communication in a Social Media Context.;Social Media + Society,2021

2. Altenhofen, Brian.  2021. “Authority: Maintaining and Establishing Authority on Facebook: A Case Study on Catholic Priests.” In Digital Religion, ed. Heidi Campbell and Ruth Tsuria, 205–12. Oxfordshire: Routledge.

3. Baxter, Leslie A.  2009. “Dialectical Processes.” In Encyclopedia of Human Relationships, ed. Harry T. Reis and Susan Sprecher, 418–20. London: Sage.

4. Reading Religion in Internet Memes.;Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture,2015

5. The Accomplishment of Authority through Presentification: How Authority Is Distributed among and Negotiated by Organizational Members.;Management Communication Quarterly,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3