Jane Addams and Epistemic Agency in Contemporary Social Work

Author:

Muurinen Heidi1,Kääriäinen Aino2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health and Welfare, Finland

2. Social Sciences, University of Helsinki

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter discusses Addams’s views on knowledge and how they resonate with evidence-informed and theory-informed social work today. Addams and her colleagues adopted the pragmatist method in experimenting and observing the consequences. Besides experiential and sympathetic knowledge, they also applied multidisciplinary knowledge. The chapter illustrates through a social workers’ group intervention model how Addams’s perspectives on knowledge application have contemporary applicability in social work. In the three analyzed groups, the social workers consciously applied the pragmatist method. The participants experienced this supported them to make their interpretations more explicit or to find new ways to operate in clinical work. This can be described as strengthening their personal epistemic agency. At the same time, the shared discussions and active listening within the group enabled epistemic agency at a collective level. To achieve this, having the group as an organizational structure was significant. Epistemic agency is a metacognitive skill that is at the core of the pragmatist method and is a characteristic of a research-minded practitioner. For contemporary social work, Addams’s thoughts on the scientific mindset, the pragmatist attitude, and using multidisciplinary research could provide insights to obtain a wider understanding of evidence-informed and theory-informed social work as a process.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference45 articles.

1. A function of the social settlement.;The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

2. Addams, J. (1902/2019). Democracy and social ethics. In The Greatest Works of Jane Addams (pp. 13–76). Madison & Adams Press.

3. Addams, J. (1910/2019). Twenty years at Hull House. In The Greatest Works of Jane Addams (pp. 171–312). Madison & Adams Press.

4. The civic value of higher education for women.;Bryn Mawr Alumnae Quarterly,1912

5. Contemporary urban social work: A scoping review.;Nordic Social Work Research,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3