Fish Traps, Seed-Grinding and Food Stores

Author:

Kerkhove Ray C.1,Silcock Jennifer L.2,Williams Douglas3,Kotarba-Morley Ania4,Keenan-Jones Duncan5,Wright Nathan J.6,Morley Mike W.7,Gorringe Joshua8,Scholz Glen9,Lowe Kelsey M.10,Cemre Üstünkaya M.8,Stephens Samantha10,Moss Patrick T.11,Westaway Michael C.10

Affiliation:

1. Education, University of Southern Queensland

2. Biological Sciences, University of Queensland

3. Access Archaeology

4. Humanities Arts and Social Science, Flinders University

5. Languages and Cultures, University of Manchester

6. Archaeology, University of New England

7. Archaeology, Flinders University

8. Independent scholar

9. Science, Information & Technology Branch, Department of Environment and Water, Adelaide

10. Social Science, University of Queensland

11. Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland

Abstract

Abstract Over the last decade of Australian archaeology there has been a notable absence of studies of Aboriginal social and economic systems on a regional scale, due in part to preference for generic modeling incorporating metadata. Such broad narratives generated by meta-data models and use of carbon dates as proxies for understanding demographic transitions can gloss over important local dynamics and details. In this study, the authors employed a regional approach to assess Australian Aboriginal food production systems. They combined early ethnographic observations with available archaeological evidence to reconstruct Mithaka economies, especially pertaining to fish traps, water management, fishing, and utilization of seeding grasses. These specific activities were targeted as being central to current debates on Australian Aboriginal food production systems. The ethnohistoric record was found to support a model of the Mithaka and their neighbors being considerably less mobile than previously assumed, concentrating on permanent waterholes especially during dry periods. The study revealed an economy uniquely adapted to the region’s “boom and bust” ecology. It was dominated by the construction and use of gigantic nets, fish traps, long-distance trade, and the processing and storage of “preserves.” On the basis of this case study, the authors propose methodologies for further archaeological investigation that could inform the “Dark Emu” debate that is currently prevalent in interpreting Australia’s deep past.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference282 articles.

1. Anon. 14 November 1866. “The Gulf Country,” Empire (Sydney), p. 2.

2. Anon. 6 December 1873. “Interesting Observations on South Australian Aboriginals,” Goulburn Herald and Chronicle, p. 2.

3. Anon. 18 June 1875. “Coopers Creek,” The North Eastern Ensign (Benalla), p. 3.

4. Anon. 18 October 1876. “A Tribe of Civilised Aborigines,” Evening News (Sydney), p 2.

5. Anon. 23 November 1876. “Colonial News,” Maryborough Chronicle, Wide Bay and Burnett Advertiser, p. 4.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3