Agent-Based Models as Digital Twins in Management Science

Author:

Mäs Michael1

Affiliation:

1. Sociology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

Abstract

Abstract Leveraging advancements in data science, computational capabilities, and artificial intelligence, researchers are constructing so-called digital twins of complex systems as diverse as space vehicles, cars, supply chains, individual patients, power plants, and cities. These digital models, characterized by their high fidelity and grounded in large amounts of frequently updated empirical data, serve as potent instruments for predicting the dynamic behaviours of these complex systems. What is more, they facilitate experimentation with counterfactual scenarios, allowing to compare digital twins with counterfactual siblings. These experiments enable modellers to address research problems that would otherwise remain unanswered due to the unavailability of empirical data, often for practical or ethical considerations. This chapter scrutinizes the challenges associated with crafting digital twins of complex organizations, contending that both technical and ethical hurdles demand careful consideration. While digital twins serve as tools to enhance organizational performance for all stakeholders, they also harbour the potential to be leveraged in ways that may run counter to the interests of certain members within the organization. This chapter posits that the evaluation and potential resolution of these challenges present formidable research opportunities for organizational modellers, underscoring these obstacles as not only impediments but also as intriguing research problems to be addressed.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference27 articles.

1. The Dissemination of Culture;Journal of Conflict Resolution,1997

2. The Evolution of Cooperation;Science,1981

3. Becker, Markus C., and Brian T. Pentland. 2021. ‘Digital Twin of an Organization: Are You Serious?’ In International Conference on Business Process Management, edited by Andrea Marrella and Barbara Weber, 243–254. Cham: Springer.

4. Natural-Language Multi-Agent Simulations of Argumentative Opinion Dynamics;Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation,2022

5. Intergroup Conflict: Individual, Group, and Collective Interests;Personality and Social Psychology Review,2003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3