Governing Flood and Climate Risks in the Netherlands and Hungary

Author:

Albright Elizabeth A.1

Affiliation:

1. Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University

Abstract

AbstractAs the world continues to experience an array of climate-driven disasters including floods, heat waves, and wildfires, how nations recover, rebuild, and build resilience to future extreme climatic events becomes even more critical for human lives and livelihoods. Within the European Union, extreme flood events are among the most damaging and costly climate-related disasters. As the global climate shifts due to greenhouse gas accumulation altering precipitation patterns, it remains unclear whether governance systems will be effective at managing climate-related disasters. In the European Union, both the Netherlands and Hungary have confronted and managed extreme flooding over centuries and will continue to face these potentially disastrous events. This cross-national comparison leverages differences in the governance of extreme flooding over centuries in these two nations to provide insights into drivers of and barriers to effective flood governance. The Netherlands, an original member of the European Union, has greater relative financial wealth and a recent history of more robust democratic practices compared to Hungary, a form Warsaw Pact nation that acceded to the European Union in 2004. Along with these differences, both nations face the challenge of integrating and implementing EU flood and climate-risk strategies and policies into their own governance systems. To help elucidate the drivers of and barriers to strengthening societal resilience to extreme climatic events, this chapter compares the extent of integration of flood governance across and within policy domains in each nation, as well as the role of civil society in flood and climate risk management.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference71 articles.

1. Aarhus Convention. “Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters.” 1998. https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/pp/documents/cep43e.pdf.

2. Adger, W. Neil. “Social Aspects of Adaptive Capacity.” In Climate Change, Adaptive Capacity and Development, 29–49. Eds. Joel B. Smith, Richard J. T. Klein, and Saleemul Huq. Singapore: World Scientific, 2003.

3. Policy Change and Learning in Response to Extreme Flood Events in Hungary: An Advocacy Coalition Approach.;Policy Studies Journal,2011

4. Bridging the Legitimacy Gap: Translating Theory into Practical Signposts for Legitimate Flood Risk Governance.;Regional Environmental Change,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3