Motivated Social Cognition About Social Justice

Author:

Hennes Erin P.1,Dang Layla2,Jost John T.3

Affiliation:

1. Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri

2. Psychological Sciences, urdue University

3. Psychology, New York University

Abstract

Abstract Barriers to veridical perceptions of the surrounding world threaten the foundations of democratic participation. In response to evidence of increasing divergence in information processing across ideological groups, scholarship on motivated social cognition has increasingly sought to tackle problems that are sociopolitical in nature. This chapter supplements and complements the review of “hot” political cognition published in the first edition of this handbook by synthesizing important advances of the past decade. The chapter draws from several disciplines, focusing on findings that clearly (a) indicate the presence of motivation and (b) demonstrate an impact on information processing. To continue advancing basic psychological science—and contribute to a more just society—the chapter makes recommendations for moving beyond mere documentation of these phenomena to (a) distinguishing underlying cognitive mechanisms, (b) identifying fundamental dispositional and situational moderators, (c), interrogating effect magnitude and generalizability, and, most importantly, (d) grounding these findings in overarching theoretical frameworks.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference240 articles.

1. Exploring the bases of partisanship in the American electorate: Social identity vs. ideology.;Political Research Quarterly,2006

2. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election.;Journal of Economic Perspectives,2017

3. Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting.;Journal of Memory and Language,2003

4. Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory.;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,1994

5. Ang, Z., Reeves, A., Rogowski, J. C., & Vishwanath, A. (2022). Partisanship, economic assessments, and presidential accountability. American Journal of Political Science, 66, 468–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12659

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3