Methods for Advancing an Open, Replicable, and Inclusive Science of Social Cognition

Author:

Ledgerwood Alison1,da Silva Frost Aline1,Kadirvel Sanjana2,Maitner Angela T.3,Wang Y. Andre4,Maddox Keith B.2

Affiliation:

1. Psychology, University of California, Davis

2. Psychology, Tufts University

3. Psychology, American University of Sharjah

4. Psychology, University of Toronto

Abstract

Abstract This chapter offers a toolkit of concrete methods and practices that researchers can use to advance open, replicable, and inclusive science. Part One describes how to calibrate confidence in a significant finding to the strength of evidence provided by that finding (e.g. understanding positive predictive value, assessing statistical power, creating effective preregistrations). Part Two describes how to calibrate the scope of a study’s conclusions to the participants and stimuli sampled for that study (e.g. reporting more complete sample characteristics, writing constraints on generality statements, forming effective cross-cultural collaborations). Part Three discusses the importance of approaching the science of social cognition from a range of vantage points and offers recommendations for improving diversity and inclusion in the field (e.g. building diverse and inclusive research teams, understanding positionality). Part Four offers strategies for researchers in different career stages to help change the field’s incentive structures to better support all of these practices.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference107 articles.

1. The cultural grounding of personal relationship: Enemyship in North American and West African worlds.;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2005

2. Sample-size planning for more accurate statistical power: A method adjusting sample effect sizes for publication bias and uncertainty.;Psychological Science,2017

3. APS member demographics. (2018). Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/pdf/2018_APS_Member_Demographics_for_Web.pdf

4. Ayoub, P., & Rose, D. (2016). In defense of “me” studies. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2016/04/14/scholarly-importance-studying-issues-related-ones-own-identity-essay

5. Implicit androcentrism: Men are human, women are gendered.;Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3