Affiliation:
1. Law, University of Miami
Abstract
Abstract
This chapter considers possible moral grounds for recognizing and realizing economic and social rights (ESRs) as human rights. It begins by suggesting that ESRs fall into three families: (1) welfare-oriented ESRs, which protect adequate income, education, health, and safe and healthful working conditions; (2) freedom-oriented ESRs, which prohibit slavery, ensure free choice of employment, and protect workers’ freedoms to organize and strike: and (3) fairness-oriented ESRs, which require nondiscrimination and equal opportunity in the workplace along with fair remuneration for one’s work. To accommodate the normative diversity found in these three families, the chapter suggests a pluralistic justificatory framework that appeals to three kinds of moral reasons: human welfare, freedom, and fairness. A final section considers the possibility of subsuming all three of these approaches to justification under the idea of human dignity or the associated idea of equal respect for persons.
Reference56 articles.
1. Arneson, Richard. 2013. “Egalitarianism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (summer 2013 edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/egalitarianism/. Last accessed January 21, 2022.
2. Arneson, Richard. 2015. “Equality of Opportunity.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2015 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/equal-opportunity/. Last accessed January 21, 2022.
3. What Future for Economic and Social Rights?;Political Studies,1995
4. Beitz, Charles. 2015. “The Force of Subsistence Rights.” In Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights, edited by Rowan Cruft, et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 545–551.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献