Affiliation:
1. Communication and Arts, University of Queensland
Abstract
AbstractThis chapter begins by outlining several kinds of relativism in the two fields that concern us here: philosophy of art and moral philosophy. It then turns to a brief review of the recent literature in experimental folk moral psychology which suggests the folk are meta-ethical pluralists—objectivists in some contexts and relativists in others. Taking the case of ancient Greek art that celebrates pederasty as a touchpoint, the author suggests that empirical work on the moral appraisal of art is likely to mesh with and lend additional support to this idea. The chapter concludes with a discussion of Bernard Williams’s “relativism of distance,” and the argument that there are, independent of the empirical findings, good meta-ethical reasons for considering a limited form of relativism about the moral standing of artworks.
Reference91 articles.
1. C14P61Baghramian, Maria, and J. Adam Carter. 2020. “Relativism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/relativism/#RelAboTruAleRel.
2. Moral Relativism in Context.;Noûs,2010
3. C14P62Beebe, James R. 2019. “How Different Kinds of Disagreement Impact Folk Metaethical Judgments.” In Advances in Experimental Moral Psychology, edited by Hagop Sarkissian and Jennifer Cole Wright, 167–187. London: Bloomsbury Academic.