Evolutionary Perspectives on Eating Disorders

Author:

Abed Riadh1

Affiliation:

1. Psychiatry, University of Sheffield

Abstract

Abstract Eating disorders (primarily anorexia and bulimia nervosa) are of particular interest to evolutionists for a number of reasons. These include the claim that they are evolutionarily novel, that they have increased in prevalence in developed countries in recent decades, their large female preponderance, and the fact that they have the highest risk of mortality of any psychiatric disorder. These, have led to a proliferation of theoretical etiological models. Some of these features increase the possibility that evolutionary approaches dealing with ultimate causation may facilitate our understanding of proximate causes. A review of the current evolutionary literature suggests that the sexual competition hypothesis has, so far, had the strongest empirical support from clinical and nonclinical studies. While other evolutionary theories focus on anorexia nervosa, the sexual competition hypothesis offers an explanation for both anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa and also explains the specific presentations of eating disorders in males.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference156 articles.

1. Sex differences in whole body skeletal muscle mass measured by magnetic resonance imaging and its distribution in young Japanese adults.;British Journal of Sports Medicine,2003

2. Eating disorders and intrasexual competition: Testing an evolutionary hypothesis among young women.;Scientific World Journal,2012

3. Abed, R., & St John-Smith, P. (2021). Evolutionary psychology and psychiatry. In T. K. Shackelford (Ed.), The Sage handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp 24–50). Sage Publications.

4. The sexual competition hypothesis for eating disorders.;British Journal of Medical Psychology,,1998

5. Adair, L. E., Dillon, H. M., & Brase, G. L. (2017). I’ll have who she’s having: Mate copying, mate poaching, and mate retention. In M. L. Fisher-MacDonnell (Ed.), Handbook on women and competition (pp. 319–336). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199376377.013.2

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3