Imposed Use

Author:

Zane Steven N.1

Affiliation:

1. Criminology and Criminal Justice, Northeastern University

Abstract

Abstract Central to the evidence-based paradigm is the explicit goal to increase the influence of scientific research on public policy. One of the central issues regarding evidence-based policy is how policymakers will actually use the best evidence to inform their decision-making. The research utilization literature delineates a number of ways that evaluation research can exert an influence on policy decisions, including conceptual, instrumental, and political. Limitations of these routes of research influence on policy, along with a growing interest in the evidence-based paradigm, have given rise to the term “imposed use,” first coined by Carol Weiss. This chapter describes the promise and limitations of imposed use for advancing evidence-based crime and justice policy.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference66 articles.

1. Policing and public health: Not quite the right analogy.;Policing and Society,2017

2. Interaction of criminological research and public policy.;Journal of Quantitative Criminology,1997

3. Evidence‐based policy strategies: A typology.;Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice,2018

4. Firearm instrumentality: Do guns make violent situations more lethal.;Annual Review of Criminology,2021

5. The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization.;American Behavioral Scientist,1979

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3