Culture and Work–Family Dynamics

Author:

Shen Winny1,Shockley Kristen M.2

Affiliation:

1. Psychology, University of Waterloo

2. Psychology, University of Georgia, USA

Abstract

Abstract Awareness of the influence of culture has permeated work–family research since its inception. In this chapter, we first briefly review the history and evolution of cross-cultural work–family research, followed by a focus on the current state of work–family research in the last decade. Although cross-cultural work–family research has experienced stunning growth over the last three decades, it still tends to be heavily centered on a limited set of constructs (i.e., work–family conflict), use a narrow range of methods (i.e., quantitative cross-sectional survey research), concentrate on certain world regions (i.e., Anglo-Asian comparisons), and predictions are based predominantly on specific cultural values (i.e., individualism–collectivism). We identify key controversies in the literature and set an agenda for future research that expands our understanding of cross-cultural work–family concerns in multiple ways, including a call for a focus on process to refine theory-building and theory-testing and diversification of research designs and methods (e.g., experiments). Implications for theory and practice are also discussed.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference70 articles.

1. Meta-analysis of work–family conflict mean differences: Does national context matter?;Journal of Vocational Behavior,2015

2. A cross-national meta-analytic examination of predictors and outcomes associated with work–family conflict.;Journal of Applied Psychology,2020

3. Allen, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2012). Older workers and work–family issues. In J. W. Hedge & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of work and aging (pp. 520–537). New York: Oxford University Press.

4. Work–family conflict among Black, White, and Hispanic men and women.;Community, Work, and Family,2017

5. A cross-national comparative study of work demands/support, work-to-family conflict and job outcomes: Ghana versus the United Kingdom.;International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3