Affiliation:
1. Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara
Abstract
Abstract
This chapter discusses intersectionality primarily in its application to scholarship on language, gender, and sexuality. Focusing on its purpose in conceptualizing the multiplicative effects of overlapping systems of oppression on individuals’ experiences, the chapter outlines major features of the theory and exemplar case studies. The chapter builds on previous Black feminist scholarship (or rather, Blackfemme(inist) scholarship) to explore how semantic bleaching has shifted understandings of intersectionality in public and academic discourse over time. Contending that the process is undergirded by a failure to engage with the architecture of race and racism, the chapter demonstrates how neoliberal conceptualizations of identity obstruct intersectional analyses of systemic oppression. A review of sociocultural linguistic scholarship on race, gender, and sexuality surveys representative work in the area. Adding to that line of research, the chapter examines the linguistic construction of Blackqueerness and concludes by suggesting a number of ways to “integrate” intersectionality more fully into the fold of language, gender, and sexuality research.
Reference98 articles.
1. Alim, Samy H. 2016. “Who’s afraid of the transracial subject?”: Raciolinguistics and the political project of transracialization.” In Raciolinguistics: How language shapes our ideas about race, ed. H. Samy Alim, John R. Rickford, and Arnetha F. Ball, 33–50. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Telfar takes over Century 21 for its NYFW after-party.;Vogue,2018
3. Engendering space: Ballroom culture and the spatial practice of possibility in Detroit.;Gender, Place & Culture,2014
4. Bailey, Moya. 2013. Race, region, and gender in early Emory School of Medicine yearbooks. Ph.D. dissertation, Emory University.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献