On the Multiplicity of Lay Expertise: An Empirical and Analytical Overview of Patient Associations’ Achievements and Challenges

Author:

Akrich Madeleine1,Rabeharisoa Vololona1

Affiliation:

1. Centre for the Sociology of Innovation, Mines Paris, PSL University

Abstract

Abstract This chapter examines patient organizations’ involvement in the production of knowledge and the governance of health. It addresses three questions: (a) what sort of knowledge and expertise do patient organizations bring in? (b) how do they trigger changes in health policy making? and (c) to what extent does the current institutionalization of patient participation strengthen democracy in contemporary societies? This chapter offers empirical and analytical insights into patient organizations’ “evidence-based activism,” a term that captures their efforts to articulate experiential knowledge and credentialed knowledge to give shape to issues they deem important to tackle, and for turning these issues into objects of collective inquiry. It also revisits notions such as “experiential knowledge,” “lay expertise,” “expert patient,” that are not only analytical tools for science and technology studies scholars and social scientists but also part and parcel of today’s institutional parlance. It concludes with a few suggestions for future investigations in health democracy.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference80 articles.

1. From Communities of Practice to Epistemic Communities: Health Mobilizations on the Internet.”;Sociological Research Online,2010

2. Akrich, Madeleine, Yannick Barthe, and Catherine Rémy. 2010. “Les enquêtes profanes et la dynamique des controverses en santé environnementale.” In Sur la piste environnementale: 129Menaces sanitaires et mobilisations profanes, edited by Madeleine Akrich, Yannick Barthe, and Catherine Rémy, 7–52. Paris: Presses des Mines.

3. Practising Childbirth Activism: A Politics of Evidence.”;BioSocieties,2014

4. Akrich, Madeleine, and Vololona Rabeharisoa. 2012. European Patient Organizations in Knowledge Society. Final Report. Project n° SIS-CT-2009-230307 funded by the European Commission. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/230307/reporting

5. Akrich, Madeleine, and Vololona Rabeharisoa. 2018. “The French ADHD Landscape: Maintaining and Dealing with Multiple Uncertainties.” In Global Perspectives on ADHD: Social Dimensions of Diagnosis and Treatment in Sixteen Countries, edited by Meredith R. Bergey, Angela M. Filipe, Peter Conrad, and Ilina Singh, 233–260. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3