Affiliation:
1. Sociology, University of Bielefeld
Abstract
Abstract
The chapter analyses the challenges posed to the trust of scientists as experts by a secular development: the end of the “exceptionalism” of science as an institution. Certified knowledge as the basis of expert advice (expertise) has a legitimating function, alongside the popular vote, but because of its instrumental value in political decision-making is always in danger of being politicized. This is exacerbated by a general movement toward the “democratization” of expertise, the recourse to expertise and “counterexpertise.” The pressure on science to be accountable has triggered an orientation toward public attention and the media (medialization), which, in turn, has initiated widespread “science communication” activities. Not least, digitization has created new opportunities and pressures. We are witnessing a self-reinforcing dynamic of continued dependence on the knowledge produced and represented by experts, triggering growing skepticism of the experts and their knowledge.
Reference77 articles.
1. Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-Makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance.”;Global Environmental Politics,2003
2. Life in the Old Blog Yet.;Nature,2018
3. Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition.”;Public Understanding of Science,2003
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献