Quantitative Measurement and the Production of Meaning

Author:

Vera Héctor1

Affiliation:

1. Research on the University and Education, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico

Abstract

Abstract This chapter analyzes how social scientists produce and employ measurements and quantification. It applies insights from symbolic interactionism and cognitive sociology to interrogate underlying assumptions of quantitative measurement, to show how researchers work to assign meaning to measures, and to depict measurement as an intersubjective accomplishment. The chapter develops three main ideas: 1) Measurement is a socio-cognitive operation. It is a radical form of single-mindedness, a mental attitude that focuses on one aspect of a multiform reality at the expense of anything else. Measurement produces quantitative differences among qualitatively fluid realities, and communities use those quantitative differences to demarcate and segregate entities in the qualitative continuum of reality. 2) Quantification is the result of meaningful interactions among people who work to assign meaning to different forms of measurements, and these measurements function as instruments that define situations and construct realities. 3) Measurements are the result of a cooperative effort in a network of people who act collectively and are organized through conventional means of doing things. Quantitative methods are an important part of the bank of knowledge that helps social scientists to coordinate large numbers of interrelated people who work at great social distances.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference52 articles.

1. Scientists Rise Up Against Statistical Significance.;Nature,2019

2. Batany, J.  1978. “El vocabulario de la categorías sociales en algunos moralistas franceses hacia 1200.” Pp. 63–82 in Ordenes, estamentos y clases, edited by D. Roche. Madrid: Siglo Veintiuno.

3. The Power of Inertia.;Qualitative Sociology,1995

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3