Resource Mobilization and Political Process Theories in Latin America

Author:

Somma Nicolás M.1

Affiliation:

1. Instituto de Sociología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Abstract

Abstract Resource mobilization theory and political process theory emerged in the 1970s and 1980s in the United States. They quickly became among the most influential approaches for studying social movements. This chapter illustrates their usefulness and limitations for studying Latin American social movements. Specifically, I discuss the extent to which the core claims, scope conditions, and assumptions of resource mobilization and political process theories are adequate for different types of Latin American social movements. I suggest that scholars of Latin American movements have long noted the relevance of resources, strategies, organizations, and political contexts, although with variegated vocabularies. I also argue that these theories provide a powerful perspective for understanding Latin American social movements, and that due to the contextual differences between the United States and Latin America, the latter provides an interesting setting for expanding and refining them.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference84 articles.

1. Movimentos sociais na teoria e na prática: como estudar o ativismo através da fronteira entre estado e sociedade?;Sociologias,2011

2. Almeida, Paul D. (2010), “Social Movement Partyism: Collective Action and Political Parties,” in Nella Van Dyke and Holly J. McCammon (eds.), Strategic Alliances: New Studies of Social Movement Coalitions, 170–96 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3