Social Movements and Participatory Institutions in Latin America

Author:

Annunziata Rocío1,Goldfrank Benjamin2

Affiliation:

1. CONICET, Universidad Nacional de San Martín

2. School of Diplomacy and International Relations, Seton Hall University

Abstract

Abstract This chapter analyzes the different relationships between participatory institutions and social movements in Latin America. While research on social movements rarely pays attention to participatory institutions, since they tend to be introduced by government authorities from the top down and oriented towards consensus, the literature on participatory institutions has been interested in social movements as key promoters, supporters, or participants. One of the most important issues concerning participatory institutions is who participates. What is the role of social movements or organized civil society in this regard? This chapter conceptualizes and describes four types of participatory institution, focusing on the role that social movements play within them. It identifies four types of such roles and then illustrates them with the most paradigmatic example of each one: National Public Policy Conferences in Brazil, Participatory Budgeting in Argentina, Citizen-Initiated Popular Consultations in Uruguay, and Communal Councils in Venezuela. In addition, other Latin American experiences are assigned to one of these four types. The conclusion highlights trade-offs between the different types, noting that the role of social movements in participatory institutions is not always and not necessarily related to more inclusionary participation.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference68 articles.

1. Grassroots Participation in Defense of Dictatorship: Venezuela’s Communal Councils and the Future of Participatory Democracy in Latin America,;The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs,2019

2. Plebiscitos, referendos e iniciativas populares en América Latina: ¿Mecanismos de control político o políticamente controlados?,;Perfiles Latinoamericanos,2010

3. Bringing Direct Democracy Back In: Toward a Three-Dimensional Measure of Democracy,;Democratization,2013

4. Altman, David (2015), Measuring the Potential of Direct Democracy Around the World (1900–2014), Working Paper Series no.17, The Varieties of Democracy Institute, University of Gothenburg.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3