Social Comparison and Competition: General Frameworks, Focused Models, and Emerging Phenomena

Author:

Garcia Stephen M.1,Tor Avishalom2

Affiliation:

1. Management, University of California, Davis

2. Law, University of Notre Dame

Abstract

Abstract Scholarship in psychology and related fields has been paying increasing attention in recent decades to the ways in which social comparison processes facilitate competitive attitudes, feelings, and behavior. As part of this development, we first advanced the Social Comparison Model of Competition (Garcia et al., 2013)—a general framework that accounted for the role of both individual and situational factors in this area—and later followed it with the more comprehensive Social Comparison Cycle of Competition (Garcia, Reese, et al., 2020). At the same time, researchers have also proposed a number of focused models to account for specific competitive relationships (e.g., rivalry), contexts (e.g., coaction), and more. In light of these important developments, this chapter briefly reviews the key takeaways from our general frameworks of social comparison and competition, demonstrates the insights offered by recognizing how more specific models fit into general frameworks, and illustrates the continued utility of these general frameworks for the study of emerging phenomena, such as social networks or sustainability, from the perspective of social comparison and competition.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference112 articles.

1. Mere categorization and the frog-pond effect.;Psychological Science,2010

2. Social norms and energy conservation.;Journal of Public Economics,2011

3. The welfare effects of nudges: A case study of energy use social comparisons.;American Economic Journal: Applied Economics,2019

4. Are social media ruining our lives? A review of meta-analytic evidence.;Review of General Psychology,2020

5. Methods to assess social comparison processes within persons in daily life: A scoping review.;Frontiers in Psychology,2020

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Malleability of Inequality Trade-Offs;Economic Analysis of Law in European Legal Scholarship;2024

2. The neuroscience of social comparison and competition;Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience;2023-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3