Affiliation:
1. Law, National Tsing Hua University
Abstract
AbstractDigital technology has transformed the way trade is conducted, and the need to modernize trade agreements to reflect this reality is long overdue. In terms of market access, WTO case law has confirmed that GATS disciplines and obligations apply to digital means of service delivery that have emerged since the WTO was concluded in 1994. However, judicial interpretation may not be the most appropriate method of clarifying whether the W/120 and the CPC cover certain international trade enabled by digital technologies. GATS classification/scheduling system must be reformed in light of innovative advances and trends toward a data-driven economy. In terms of domestic regulation, governments are facing dilemmas between maximizing opportunities stemming from digital trade by freeing the flow of data and managing the impact of cross-border data flows for other policy objectives, which include privacy and cybersecurity. Drawing from the experiences of the FTAs, an obvious challenge is the inherent sensitivity of interfering with other parties’ ‘digital sovereignty’. Particular attention should be paid to the soft legal nature of certain provisions and loose exceptions under the digital trade/e-commerce chapters. Furthermore, ‘special and differential treatment’ will eventually be the focal points of digital trade and data governance.
Reference9 articles.
1. The Governance of Data and Data Flows in Trade Agreements: The Pitfalls of Legal Adaptation;U.C. Davis Law Review,2017
2. Data Nationalism;Emory Law Journal,2015
3. C29.P42Gao, H., ‘Across the Great Wall: E-commerce Joint Statement Initiative Negotiation and China’ in S. Peng et al. (eds), Artificial Intelligence and International Economic Law (Cambridge University Press, 2021) 295
4. Governing Digital Trade;World Trade Review,2019
5. Regulating Cross-Border Data Flows in a Data-Driven World: How WTO Law Can Contribute;Journal of International Economic Law,2019