Judge Language Choices

Author:

Ash Elliott1

Affiliation:

1. Law, ETH Zurich

Abstract

Abstract This chapter provides an overview of scientific research into the language choices made by judges. First, it introduces a foundational model to frame the judge’s linguistic decisions, considering both the institutional inputs and downstream impacts. Second, it explores the use of natural language processing tools for measuring judicial language choices, highlighting the challenges faced due to the multifaceted and intricate nature of language. Then the focus shifts to the determinants of these choices, evaluating existing empirical studies with an acknowledgment of the inherent challenges in establishing broad causal evidence given the scarcity of natural or field experiments. Fourth, the chapter examines the consequences of judicial language choices, an even harder problem given the challenge of disentangling other aspects of a judge’s choices besides language. In both respects, a number of important findings have been developed, yet many fundamental questions in judge language choice remain unanswered. The chapter concludes with a discussion of some promising paths for future work.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference67 articles.

1. Predicting Judicial Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A Natural Language Processing Perspective;PeerJ Computer Science,2016

2. Ash, Elliott, Daniel Chen, and Suresh Naidu. 2020. ‘Ideas Have Consequences: The Impact of Law and Economics on American Justice’. Center for Law & Economics Working Paper Series 4. https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/376884

3. Gender Attitudes in the Judiciary: Evidence from US Circuit Courts;American Economic Journal: Applied Economics,2024

4. Measuring Judicial Sentiment: Methods and Application to US Circuit Courts;Economica,2022

5. Relatio: Text semantics capture political and economic narratives.;Political Analysis,2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3