Abstract
Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of computational text analysis techniques used to study judicial behaviour and decision-making. As legal texts become increasingly digitalized, scholars can draw on tools from machine learning and natural language processing to convert unstructured texts into quantitative data that is amenable to empirical analysis. A burgeoning field of computational legal analysis uses these tools to study the law and legal institutions. The chapter surveys common methods for representing legal documents. These methods vary in sophistication from simple word counts to more complex tools such as topic modelling and word embeddings. Each approach has strengths and weakness and makes trade-offs between richness of representation, interpretability, and dimensionality reduction. Extracting meaningful data from legal texts requires thoughtful choices about representation and preprocessing. The chapter discusses interpretation, bias, and domain-specific challenges as important considerations when applying text analysis to study courts. Overall, computational text analysis supplements traditional methods and opens new avenues for empirical legal scholarship.
Reference96 articles.
1. Using Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes of Accident Cases in Moroccan Courts;Procedia Computer Science,2021
2. Predicting Judicial Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A Natural Language Processing Perspective;PeerJ Computer Science,2016
3. Alschner, Wolfgang, and Damien Charlotin. 2022. ‘Data Mining, Text Analytics, and Investor-State Arbitration’. In International Arbitration and Technology, edited by Pietro Ortolani, André Janssen, and Pieter Wolters, 135–58. Nijmegen: Kluwer Law International.
4. What Kind of Judge Is Brett Kavanaugh?;Cardozo Law Review De-Novo,2018
5. Ash, Elliott, and Daniel L. Chen. 2019. ‘Case Vectors: Spatial Representations of the Law Using Document Embeddings’. In Law as Data: Computation, Text, and the Future of Legal Analysis, edited by Michael A. Livermore and Daniel N. Rockmore, 313–37. Santa Fe: Santa Fe Institute Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Computational Legal Studies Comes of Age;European Journal of Empirical Legal Studies;2024-05-13