Affiliation:
1. Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History
Abstract
Abstract
Cognitive archaeology has traditionally focused on thresholds of development, scouring the material record for hallmarks of modernity and exploring reconstructed or living hominin brains to identify clearly bounded step changes in cognitive abilities. However, in the last decade or so, the concepts of metaplasticity and material engagement have been used to question not only the linearity of such changes, but also, in some cases, whether the human mind can realistically be considered as an entity separate from the material environments in which it operates. This chapter reviews the latest discussions in neuroscience, archaeology, and paleoecology, focusing in particular on Middle-to-Late Pleistocene human origins to promote the idea that environments, objects, and minds are inseparably intertwined. Building on elements of recent “4E” (embodied, embedded, enacted, and extended) approaches to cognition, it argues that the flexibility and fluidity with which our species forms connections between these realms, rather than any single material marker or behavioral horizon, point us toward what it means to be human.
Reference174 articles.
1. Metaplasticity: The plasticity of synaptic plasticity.;Trends in Neurosciences,1996
2. Altenmüller, E., & Furuya, S. (2016). Brain plasticity and the concept of metaplasticity in skilled musicians. In J. Laczko & M. Latash (Eds.), Progress in motor control (pp. 197–208). Springer.
3. Palaeolithic technology and human evolution.;Science,2001
4. Metaplasticity and the boundaries of social cognition: Exploring scalar transformations in social interaction and intersubjectivity.;Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences,2019
5. How the Cycladic islanders found their marbles: Material engagement, social cognition and the emergence of Keros.;Cambridge Archaeological Journal,2020