Author:
König Thomas,Marbach Moritz,Osnabrügge Moritz
Abstract
This article presents a new method for estimating positions of political parties across country- and time-specific contexts by introducing a latent variable model for manifesto data. We estimate latent positions and exploit bridge observations to make the scales comparable. We also incorporate expert survey data as prior information in the estimation process to avoid ex post facto interpretation of the latent space. To illustrate the empirical contribution of our method, we estimate the left-right positions of 388 parties competing in 238 elections across twenty-five countries and over sixty years. Compared to the puzzling volatility of existing estimates, we find that parties more modestly change their left-right positions over time. We also show that estimates without country- and time-specific bias parameters risk serious, systematic bias in about two-thirds of our data. This suggests that researchers should carefully consider the comparability of party positions across countries and/or time.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference108 articles.
1. Some readers might object that our assumptions to estimate the model are too strong and that it is not worth it to trade off the empirical uncertainty about the comparability of the data against the theoretical uncertainty about the validity of our model assumptions. Although we agree with these potential critiques about the existence of this trade-off, we stress that we find it more useful to have clearly specified uncertainty about some underlying modeling assumptions than uncertainty buried in the data.
2. The European Parliament's Role in Closer EU Integration
3. When Left Is Right: Party Ideology and Policy in Post-Communist Europe
Cited by
57 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献