Author:
D'Orazio Vito,Landis Steven T.,Palmer Glenn,Schrodt Philip
Abstract
Due in large part to the proliferation of digitized text, much of it available for little or no cost from the Internet, political science research has experienced a substantial increase in the number of data sets and large-nresearch initiatives. As the ability to collect detailed information on events of interest expands, so does the need to efficiently sort through the volumes of available information. Automated document classification presents a particularly attractive methodology for accomplishing this task. It is efficient, widely applicable to a variety of data collection efforts, and considerably flexible in tailoring its application for specific research needs. This article offers a holistic review of the application of automated document classification for data collection in political science research by discussing the process in its entirety. We argue that the application of a two-stage support vector machine (SVM) classification process offers advantages over other well-known alternatives, due to the nature of SVMs being a discriminative classifier and having the ability to effectively address two primary attributes of textual data: high dimensionality and extreme sparseness. Evidence for this claim is presented through a discussion of the efficiency gains derived from using automated document classification on the Militarized Interstate Dispute 4 (MID4) data collection project.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference91 articles.
1. Rennie J. D. , Shih L. , Teevan J. , and Karger D. R. 2003. Tackling the poor assumptions of naive bayes text classifiers. Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning, Washington, DC.
2. Fightin' Words: Lexical Feature Selection and Evaluation for Identifying the Content of Political Conflict
3. Term 1 is “said,” which commonly appears in news reports.
4. See Joachims (2002, 167–9) for a detailed explanation of how transductive SVMs formalize a decision rule.
Cited by
48 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献