Determination of Captan in Water, Peaches, and Apple Juice by a Magnetic Particle-Based Immunoassay

Author:

Itak Jeanne A1,Selisker Michele Y1,Herzog David P1,Fleeker James R2,Bogus Edward R3,Mumma Ralph O3

Affiliation:

1. Ohmicron Corporation, 375 Pheasant Run, Newtown, PA 18940

2. North Dakota State University, 310 Loftsgard Hall, PO Box 5516, University Station, Fargo, ND 58105

3. Pesticide Research Laboratory, Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802

Abstract

Abstract A magnetic particle-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EUSA) was used to determine captan residues in water, peaches, and apple juice. Precision studies of captan-spiked water samples showed coefficients of variation (CVs) of 24% at 0.1 ppm and 15% at 2.0 ppm. Average recoveries from water were 110–118%, with an estimated sensitivity of 0.01 ppm for captan. Low cross-reactivity was seen with the related phthalimide fungicides capta-fol and folpet. A least-detectable dose (LDD) of 1 ppm was estimated for captafol in the immunoassay; an LDD of 8.6 ppm was estimated for folpet. Apple juice samples were analyzed by a 3-step procedure: the sample was concentrated on a Cis bonded silica solid-phase column, the eluate was diluted in buffer, and the sample was assayed by ELISA. The detection limit in apple juice was estimated to be 0.1 ppm on the basis of the detection limit observed in water and the required calculation factors; the average recovery was 115%. Acetone extraction, Cis bonded silica solid-phase extraction column, and the immunoassay were used consecutively to analyze peach samples. The detection limit in peaches was estimated to be 0.15 ppm on the basis of the detection limit observed in water and the required calculation factors. Captan residues were found in all but one of the peach samples and ranged from 0.15 to 1.12 ppm (|ig/g). Recovery of added captan from peaches averaged 98% for both spike levels tested. Results of analysis of captan in peaches by immunoassay and gas chromatography with electron capture detection (GC/ECD) were compared. GC/ECD gave an average recovery of 75%; immunoassay gave an average recovery of 112%.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pharmacology,Agronomy and Crop Science,Environmental Chemistry,Food Science,Analytical Chemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3