Conversion of the MDHAQ to the HAQ score: a simple algorithm developed and validated in a cohort of 13 391 real-world patients

Author:

Ørnbjerg Lykke M1ORCID,Svensson Elisabeth2,Løngaard Katja3,Meincke Rikke H1,Pedersen Jens Kristian4,Dreyer Lene56,Krogh Niels Steen7,Jensen Dorte V1,Hetland Merete L18ORCID

Affiliation:

1. DANBIO, Copenhagen Centre for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet , Glostrup

2. RKKP – The Danish Clinical Quality Program , Aarhus

3. RKKP – The Danish Clinical Quality Program , Frederiksberg

4. Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine M, Odense University Hospital and Svendborg Hospital , Svendborg

5. Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital

6. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University , Aalborg

7. Zitelab Aps , Frederiksberg

8. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To develop and validate in real-world patients a conversion algorithm from the Multidimensionel Health Assessment Questionnaire physical function scale (MDHAQ) to the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index physical function scale (HAQ) score. Methods From the DANBIO registry, 13 391 patients with RA (n = 8983), PsA (n = 2649) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA, n = 1759) with longitudinal data on HAQ and MDHAQ were included, stratified by diagnosis, and randomized 1:1 into development and validation cohorts. Conversion algorithms were developed by linear regression and applied in validation cohorts. From MDHAQ, the HAQ was calculated (cHAQ) and validated against the observed HAQ for criterion, correlational and construct validity. Results For RA, we developed the conversion algorithm cHAQ = 0.15+MDHAQ*1.08, and validated it in the RA validation cohort. Criterion validity: HAQ and cHAQ had comparable discriminative power to distinguish between high and low patient global scores (standardized mean difference: HAQ:–1.29, cHAQ:–1.35). Kappa value between HAQ and cHAQ functional states indicated good agreement (0.83). Correlational validity: baseline HAQ and cHAQ, respectively, correlated well with patient global scores (r = 0.65/0.67). Bland–Altman plots showed good agreement across all functional states. Construct validity: HAQ and cHAQ discriminated equally well between patients reporting symptom state as acceptable vs not, and across responses to an external anchor. Aiming for a common algorithm, the RA conversion algorithm was validated for PsA and axSpA with similar results. Conclusion This study suggests that in observational datasets with only the MDHAQ available, a simple algorithm allows valid conversion to HAQ on the group level in RA, PsA and axSpA.

Funder

DANBIO

AbbVie

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Rheumatology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3